EventLens
Event-Structure Reinforcement Learning
for Video Understanding

Guowen Zhang1, Boshen Xu1, Zihao Yue1, Ziheng Wang1,
Xiaokun Liu2,*, Xin Tao2, Wenyu Qin2, Pengfei Wan2, Qin Jin1,†

1 AIM3 Lab, Renmin University of China2 Kling AI

† Corresponding Author; * Industry Project Lead.

The paper, training dataset, and EventLens-4B / 8B models are now available.

Abstract

Recent multimodal large language models (MLLMs) achieve strong results on video question answering, yet often fail to recover the temporal structure that makes a video coherent. They may merge neighboring events, miss single-event progression, or infer implausible relations across events. We study structured temporal understanding as the ability to recover event structure from visual evidence, including event boundaries, single-event progression, and multi-event relations. We argue that this gap arises from a mismatch between current post-training objectives and temporal reasoning, where caption-style supervision allows models to rely on language shortcuts rather than visual temporal grounding.

To address this, we propose EventLens, a vision-centric reinforcement learning framework that learns video understanding through event-structure recovery. Instead of reconstructing captions, EventLens trains models to recover temporal structure under controlled perturbations, such as altered temporal granularity, reversed progression, and shuffled event order. We instantiate this framework with a three-level temporal ontology and derive three verifiable task families: event segmentation, progression discrimination, and multi-event relation reasoning. These tasks admit deterministic rewards, enabling task-specialized GRPO training without human preference labels or learned reward models. We further introduce multi-teacher on-policy distillation (MT-OPD) to consolidate specialized policies into a unified model. Experiments on Qwen3-VL backbones show consistent improvements on temporal grounding and event-sensitive reasoning benchmarks, while preserving general video-QA performance. Learning curves further demonstrate that EventLens achieves comparable downstream transfer with significantly reduced training cost compared to direct mixed RL optimization.

Overall Contributions and Illustration

EventLens recovers event boundaries, distinguishes forward and reversed progression, and reasons about next events, missing events, and shuffled event order.
Three complementary event-structure recovery tasks.
Task-specialized GRPO teachers followed by multi-teacher on-policy distillation into a unified student.
Task-specialized GRPO followed by MT-OPD.

We introduce EventLens, a vision-centric reinforcement learning framework that learns video understanding through event-structure recovery. Our contributions are:

  • Event-structure recovery as a unified target. We formulate structured temporal understanding as event-structure recovery from visual evidence, unifying event boundaries, intra-event progression, and inter-event relations.
  • Vision-centric reinforcement learning. We propose EventLens, a vision-centric reinforcement learning framework that learns video understanding through temporal perturbation and recovery with verifiable rewards.
  • Specialization and multi-teacher distillation. We introduce a training paradigm with task-specialized GRPO and multi-teacher on-policy distillation (MT-OPD), enabling stable integration of heterogeneous temporal skills.
  • Temporal transfer and training efficiency. We demonstrate consistent improvements on temporal-structure benchmarks with controlled retention on general video QA, and improved training efficiency compared to direct mixed RL optimization.

Experiments

Temporal Grounding and Complex Reasoning

Original paper Table 1: temporal grounding and complex reasoning for Qwen3-VL-4B and 8B, SFT-Desc, SFT-DVC, and EventLens under the shared 256-frame protocol.
Full resolution · PDF

EventLens achieves the best temporal-grounding scores across both Qwen3-VL backbones. Reasoning gains concentrate on event-sensitive benchmarks such as E.T. Bench.

General and Long-Video QA

Original paper Table 2: general and long-video QA scores for Qwen3-VL-4B and 8B, SFT-Desc, SFT-DVC, and EventLens.
Full resolution · PDF

EventLens preserves comparable broad video-QA performance while improving event-sensitive reasoning. VinoGround gains 8.00 points at 4B and 7.00 points at 8B over the instruction base.

Ablation & Analysis

Teacher Specialization and Consolidation

Original paper Table 4: full teacher-consolidation ablation on Qwen3-VL-4B, including all eight downstream metrics and the single-teacher oracle.
Full resolution · PDF

No individual teacher is best on every benchmark. MT-OPD consolidates their complementary strengths into one student, recovering most of the single-teacher oracle envelope.

Supervision Robustness

Original paper Table 6: instruction base, clean training, 10 percent jitter, and 20 percent jitter across all six benchmarks in the 100-step pilot.
Full resolution · PDF

With 20% timestamp perturbation, all six metrics remain above the instruction base and close to clean training in the 100-step pilot. The gains persist under moderate noise in automatically reconstructed event supervision.

Training Efficiency

Original paper Figure 4: OPD and EMA-GRPO wall-clock transfer curves on E.T. Bench, MVBench, TL-Charades, and VinoGround.
Original paper Figure 4: MT-OPD student optimization versus direct Mixed-GRPO. PDF

MT-OPD reaches a comparable downstream transfer regime after roughly 13 hours, while direct Mixed-GRPO needs roughly 37 hours. This comparison measures student-stage optimization; specialist-teacher training time is excluded.

Training Data

A shared event hierarchy supports complementary recovery tasks.
Temporal grounding and video QA provide additional training signals.

Scene-first annotation organizes video into thematic phases, semantic events, and atomic action units, then constructs boundary, progression, and relation tasks.
Scene-first annotation and task construction. The illustrated boundaries and event assignments are schematic.
Source-video domains span food and culinary activities, daily life, engineering and mechanics, sports and outdoors, culture and media, and general videos.
Source-video domains before recovery-task construction.

Download the training dataset and the EventLens-4B / EventLens-8B student models.

Demo Cases

Qualitative examples of event progression and final-state reasoning.

TempCompass example: a pixelated object transforms from flower to heart to square. The baseline selects flower to heart, while EventLens correctly selects flower to square.
Event progression. EventLens follows the full flower → heart → square transition and maps its initial and final states to the requested answer.
Basketball example: the baseline output truncates before resolving the winner. EventLens selects the final game state and identifies the winning team as black shirts and white shorts.
Final-state grounding. EventLens selects the final score and grounds the winning team in its visual appearance.